HomeAbout UsServicesClient AchievementsNewsStaffContact Us

May 13, 2005

Back to News

In this Issue


Energy & Commerce Plans Hearing on Generic Drug Use


Senate Bioterrorism Subcommittee Holds First “Threats” Hearing


Crawford FDA Nomination Further Muddled


FDA Drug Safety Activities Step Up


Stem Cells to be on House Floor


Counterfeit Drug Bill Offered in House


Johanns Approves Funding for Soybean Rust Surveillance Network


Goodlatte Meets With Ag Groups to Talk Budget, Reconciliation


CAFTA Will Be Rejected, Says ND Senator;
Heads of CAFTA Nations Join Bush in Pushing for Trade Pact


Federal Court Upholds CAFO Ruling


Senate to Take Up Highway Bill, Defying Bush Veto Threat Over Cost


BSE UPDATE:


New Bills
 

Energy & Commerce Plans Hearing on Generic Drug Use

On May 18, the House Energy & Commerce health subcommittee plans to hold a hearing on increasing the utilization of generic drugs. The subcommittee plans to invite representatives of payers, the generic drug industry, and others, with a view toward understanding how to increase utilization of generic drugs.

The hearing is driven in part by the fact that the Energy & Commerce Committee (like the Ways & Means Committee, in the case of Medicare) will be looking for ways to achieve substantial savings in the Medicare and Medicaid programs, under the Budget Resolution. The subcommittee hopes to identify how at least some of these savings could come from increased use of generic drugs by beneficiaries of these programs, and by implementation of techniques to assure increased use by various payers.

Although the hearing is not intended to address other generic drug issues, there is no question other matters will be raised, such as “authorized generics,” generic or follow-on biological products, so-called “wild card exclusivity,” (such as proposed in a Senate-introduced Bioshield II bill as an incentive for companies to develop bioterrorism agents), and other issues that define the ongoing battles of innovator vs. generic drugs.

Return to top


Senate Bioterrorism Subcommittee Holds First “Threats” Hearing

On May 11, the Senate Health, Education, Labor & Pensions subcommittee on Bioterrorism and Public Health Preparedness held a hearing on “21st Century Biological Threats,” launching the subcommittee’s study on the need for legislation and administrative actions to ensure optimal preparedness for bioterrorism attacks. According to subcommittee chair Sen. Richard Burr (R-NC), “In the days since September 11, we’ve made great progress in better preparing ourselves for a bioterror attack. Clearly, however, there is more to do.”

Witnesses included Dr. John Deutch, Professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and CIA Director and Deputy Secretary of Defense; Dr. Harvey Fineberg, President of the Institute of Medicine of the National Academies of Science; Dr. Craig Venter, Director of the Venter Institute; Dr. Guenael Rodier, Director of the Department of Communicable Disease Surveillance and Response of the World Health Organization; and Dr. Shelley Hearne, Executive Director of Trust for America’s Health.

Deutch urged improved intelligence about bioterrorism threats, training and resources for first responders, and emergency procedures and policies; enhanced research and development of new ways to detect and treat diseases from biological agents; and re-instituting across-the-board immunization against smallpox. While he acknowledged the smallpox threat may be small and there is a need to address liability protections for manufacturers of smallpox vaccine and compensation for those who may be injured by a vaccine, he stated such vaccination is needed.

Rodier focused on the global nature of the threat from known, emerging and unknown microbial agents and of the growing problem of antimicrobial resistance. He urged all countries strengthen early warning systems and response capabilities so outbreaks of disease can be controlled locally and do not become epidemic.

Also discussing microbial threats, Fineberg noted variations in the capacity and capability of public health systems to respond to and manage problems continues and is a serious hurdle. He also mentioned the growth of antimicrobial resistance, a relative dearth of new antimicrobial agents available or in development, and the dangerous decline of vaccine manufacturers.

Venter focused on the promise of new biotechnology approaches and techniques, including genomics, in identifying and controlling threats. He urged continued funding for basic research, especially in areas such as genomics, as well as increased support for developing new methods for better and faster detection of emerging infectious agents. Finally, he supported the establishment of additional incentives for pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies to develop products such as new vaccines and antimicrobials, as well as specific anti-bioterrorism agents. He specifically mentioned directed government funding, similar to the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency of the Department of Defense.

Burr indicated his intention to hold several hearings regarding these issues, and consider Bioshield II legislation to build on what already is being accomplished under Bioshield I.

Return to top

Crawford FDA Nomination Further Muddled

The nomination of Dr. Lester M. Crawford to be Commissioner of the Food & Drug Administration (FDA), already put on temporary hold because of anonymous allegations, now confronts additional issues.

Still concerned about FDA’s action (or lack thereof) to convert the Plan B contraceptive product to over-the-counter status, Sens. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) and Patty Murray (D-WA) now have an additional concern. According to press reports, Dr. David Hager, a member of the FDA reproductive drugs advisory committee, has revealed he sent a memo to the agency after a majority of the committee approved changing to OTC status and he voted against it. Hager, who is also a minister, reportedly gave a sermon in which he described his memo and stated his view that the Plan B OTC switch would have been evil. He also stated that his memo, laying out additional scientific concerns about the OTC switch, was influential in persuading FDA to take a course of action different from that recommended by a majority on the committee. After learning of this memo, Clinton and Murray asked HHS Secretary Mike Leavitt to look into the matter. They indicated that until this is resolved, they would oppose Senate approval of Crawford’s nomination.

If that weren’t enough, Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) is now saying he intends to hold up the nomination for an unrelated reason. According to Coburn, FDA should have implemented a congressional directive, included in an appropriations bill in 2000, to modify the labeling of condoms to make clear they do not prevent all sexually transmitted diseases. The time in which this should have been done, said Coburn, was on Crawford’s watch. In response, FDA said a proposal was sent to the Office of Management & Budget (OMB) earlier this year and is pending.

The 2000 appropriations bill provision in question requires the Secretary of HHS to “reexamine existing condom labels … to determine whether the labels are medically accurate regarding the overall effectiveness or lack of effectiveness … in preventing sexually transmitted diseases, including HPV [human papilloma virus].” This provision stops short of what was included in legislation passed by the House that same year, but not enacted, to render a condom misbranded “unless its label and labeling bear information providing that condoms do not effectively prevent the transmission of the human papilloma virus and that such virus can cause cervical cancer.”

 

Return to top

 

FDA Drug Safety Activities Step Up

On May 4, FDA issued a chapter of the Center for Drug Evaluation & Research (CDER) Manual of Policies and Procedures (MAPP) outlining the organizational structure and responsibilities of the new Drug Safety Oversight Board, an entity announced several months ago by Acting FDA Commissioner Lester Crawford. According to the MAPP, this board will “provide independent oversight and advice to the Center Director” and “manage the dissemination of certain safety information.” Anyone on the Board who was involved in the review of an application, or in making a regulatory decision, will be recused from the Board’s voting related to that product or application.

Board membership will include the Deputy Director of CDER as the non-voting chair; three individuals and two alternatives from each of the Offices of Drug Safety & New Drugs; one individual and one alternative from each of the Offices of Counter Terrorism & Pediatric Drug Development, Compliance, Pharmaceutical Science, Clinical Pharmacology & Biopharmaceutics, and Biostatistics; and one individual and one alternate from each of CBER, CDRH, a non-FDA HHS agency such as NIH, and a non-HHS health organization such as the VA or DoD. The director of the CDER Office of Medical Policy also will be a non-voting member.

The MAPP lays out how the Board will operate, including: the Board can establish subcommittees and working groups, hire consultants, etc.; that any CDER organization may refer an issue to the Board; that Board decisions will be recommendations to the CDER Director; and that all non-FDA members will be screened for conflicts of interest. The MAPP makes clear that final authority for regulatory decisions rests with the CDER Director.

In further action, in the Federal Register of May 10, FDA published a Draft Guidance on its newly announced “Drug Watch” web page, on which the agency will post emerging drug safety information. The document acknowledges all drugs have risks and that there generally is a period of uncertainty after a safety report is received during which the agency and the product sponsor work to verify information and identify next steps. However, the document also emphasizes the importance of advising consumers and physicians as soon as possible. The Draft Guidance “FDA’s ‘Drug Watch’ for Emerging Drug Safety Information” states the Drug Watch page might post factual information about newly observed serious adverse events, information about serious emerging risks FDA believes could be associated with a drug, or information about the implementation of a new risk minimization procedure.

The Draft says most information to be included in this page currently is available publicly through Freedom of Information Act requests. There will be a disclaimer, according to the Draft, on any information the agency is still evaluating, stating that the information is based on a preliminary analysis and is not conclusive. Among the factors the agency will consider in deciding what information to post will be whether the new safety information could have a significant effect on prescribing or use decisions, whether providing the information will allow steps to be taken to prevent harm, and whether off-label use “appears to pose a significant risk to patients.” It will be one of the new Drug Safety Oversight Board’s responsibilities to manage this web page, determining what information to post and when drugs will be removed from the page.

Drug sponsors would be notified before the first posting of their drug on the page. The Guidance states that information on the Drug Watch page, or the fact that a drug appears there, may not be used in promoting other products.

Comments on the Draft Guidance are due August 10.

A meeting on May 18 and May 19 of the FDA Drug Safety & Risk Management Advisory Committee will add additional fuel to the drug safety discussions. The committee is meeting for two days to “explore issues related to FDA’s risk assessment program for marketed drugs.” The committee will hear presentations from FDA and the public, and is asked to discuss and possibly make recommendations regarding the advantages and disadvantages of the current system or alternate approaches to detecting risk signals.

 

Return to top

Stem Cells to be on House Floor

A House floor vote on “The Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2005,” H.R. 810, a bi-partisan bill sponsored by Reps. Mike Castle (R-DE) and Diana DeGette (D-CO) is expected as early as next week. House Republican leadership had previously promised a clean vote on legislation to broaden funding for stem cell research. The bill specifies federally fundable cell lines come from IVF-created embryos donated by infertile couples who no longer need the embryos to have children and would otherwise discard them. Couples would donate embryos with written informed consent and would not receive any compensation.

New poll data was released by the Republican Mainstreet Partnership on Republican attitudes towards stem cell research, both nationally and in key Republican-held congressional districts. They have also launched a new advertising campaign to encourage Republicans Representatives to support the Castle/DeGette Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act.

The poll findings include:
• Republicans nationally favor embryonic stem cell research by a 55-38% margin.
• 79% of Republicans believe finding a cure for disease is a moral obligation
• 69% believe stem cell research can generate significant advances, though they split three ways between whether embryonic or adult or cord blood sources are most promising, and a similar number "don't know."
• Asked whether this is a scientific issue or a right-to-life issue, Republicans said scientific issue by 54-40% margin.
• In key Republican Congressional districts, all voters favored embryonic stem cell research by a 66-27% margin, and Republicans in those districts supported the research 53-37%.

Return to top

Counterfeit Drug Bill Offered in House

This week Rep. Steve Israel (D-NY) introduced “Tim Fagan’s Law” or the “Counterfeit Drug Enforcement Act of 2005” (H.R.2345). This legislation would make it a crime for a person to adulterate or misbrand a drug for sale or trade; or knowingly buy an adulterated or misbranded drug. Punishment includes fines and/or imprisonment for up to life.

Manufacturers hold primary responsibility in this bill which requires manufacturers that receive or are aware of adulteration or misbranding to report the information to the Secretary within 48 hours. The Secretary also has the power to consider drugs misbranded if the manufacturer fails to use technology deemed technically feasible by the Secretary.

Proof of a chain of custody must be maintained from the drug manufacturer throughout the wholesale distribution to a pharmacist. However, once “track and trace” or other feasible technology is available this requirement will not apply. Excluded from this requirement are intracompany sales or sales within group purchasing organizations. Further requirements on manufacturers include maintaining at corporate offices a current list of the authorized distributors of a drug.

Authorization for this bill includes $60 million per year for FDA to conduct inspections, examinations and investigations on suspected counterfeit drugs. In addition, $5 million per year is authorized for the Secretary to educate the public and health care professionals on counterfeit drugs, including how to identify counterfeits drugs.

The Secretary is also given authority to immediately order a cease in distribution of a drug and notify health professionals of the order if he is reasonably sure a drug could cause serious, adverse health problems or death. Finally, the bill gives the Secretary and Attorney General the authority to issue subpoenas for the investigation of counterfeit drugs.

The bill is named after a 16-year old who in 2002 underwent a liver transplant. Fagan’s parents purchased prescription drugs at a major pharmacy; however, the drugs they purchased turned out to be counterfeit.


Return to top

Johanns Approves Funding for Soybean Rust Surveillance Network

Over $1 million in contingency money will be spent by USDA to monitor, report and manage soybean rust during the coming growing season, Secretary of Agriculture Mike Johanns said this week. Johanns said $1.2 million will help enhance the federal, state and industry-coordinated effort so that producers get good information on where soybean rust exists and how to best protect against it.

USDA’s Animal & Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) will apply the funding to soybean rust surveillance and monitoring; predictive modeling; web-based information dissemination; finalizing fungicide criteria and communications/outreach. About $800,000 will be spent on setting up sentinel plots in 35 states and Puerto Rico, $120,000 will be spent on mobile survey units, and $210,000 will be spent on updating and maintaining the new USDA soybean rust website at www.usda.gov/soybeanrust.

The fungus was first found in Louisiana last year. It is now in eight other states: Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, Missouri, South Carolina and Tennessee.

 

Return to top

Goodlatte Meets With Ag Groups to Talk Budget, Reconciliation

The good news is ag will only take a $173 million spending hit in FY2006 ($3 billion through 2010), but the bad news is now those cuts have to be reconciled with existing spending authority. Ag groups are worried about where those cuts will fall. To find out how worried these groups are, House Agriculture Committee Chair Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) called a meeting of farm production organizations this week, saying, “Let me emphasize it is my intention to guide the committee through reconciliation in a careful and deliberate manner.” He also said he would be calling regular meetings of affected groups to get their input on the budget cutting process.

Under the budget reconciliation system, once the total amount of budget cutting is determined, the committee’s that authorize the federal programs must go back to the drawing board and submit a plan to the House Budget Committee on how and where those cuts will be made. These plans are due by Sept. 16, 2005.

 

Return to top

CAFTA Will Be Rejected, Says ND Senator;
Heads of CAFTA Nations Join Bush in Pushing for Trade Pact

The Central America-Dominican Republic Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) will not be approved because Congress is “drawing the line” on failed U.S. trade initiatives that have contributed to this nation’s overall trade deficit, said a leading Senate critic this week.

Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-ND), who with Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) is leading the Senate charge against CAFTA, issued his prediction May 12, the same day the six presidents of CAFTA nations were in Washington, DC, to rally support for the agreement. Dorgan called the appearance of the six chief executives on Capitol Hill “unprecedented and desperate” lobbying of Congress by foreign heads of state.

President Bush said passage of CAFTA is crucial to America’s security and commitment to democratic change in Central America and the Caribbean.

 

Return to top

Federal Court Upholds CAFO Ruling

The federal court this week refused to reconsider its February 28 ruling on EPA’s confined animal feeding operation (CAFO) rule, restating that animal producers who do not actually discharge into U.S. waters do not have to apply for discharge permits under the Clean Water Act. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit rejected a rehearing sought by environmental groups that held all producers, whether they discharge into waters or not, should be required to have permits. The court agreed with the environmental groups that when a permit is required, the nutrient management plan must be included in the permit and open for public review.

 

Return to top

Senate to Take Up Highway Bill, Defying Bush Veto Threat Over Cost

The Senate began formal consideration of the omnibus highway program reauthorization bill late this week, a bill that faces a possible White House veto over its cost. President Bush has said the bill can cost no more that $283.9 billion; the Senate package is estimated to cost nearly $300 billion over six years. The House bill, passed last month, meets the White House cost target but faces Administration displeasure because it carries a provision allowing it to be reopened to increase spending after three years.

Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK), chair of the Senate Environment & Public Works Committee, will offer next week a substitute bill that addresses concerns by Senators from states that pay more in federal gasoline taxes than they receive in federal highway aid. His bill would authorize about $251 billion in direct transportation payments and shift dollars to highways and transit funding. Together with FY2006 spending expectations, the bill’s cost is $295.6 billion.

The Senate is expected to vote on the full package May 17. As of May 13, more than 30 amendments had been submitted for consideration when the full Senate meets.


Return to top

BSE UPDATE

New Indications Japan Closer to Opening Beef Trade;
Japan Confirms 18th Case of BSE

Japanese lawmakers from that nation’s ruling party this week endorsed a plan to lift Japan’s ban on imports of U.S. beef. The action, a meeting of major party leaders and ministry officials, came about after Japan’s Food Safety Commission recommended the government waive animal testing for domestic cattle less than 21 months old. This cleared the way for the same standard to be used with imported animals and products.

Meanwhile, all 47 Japanese states – prefectures – will continue to blanket test cattle for BSE. A Holstein cow, said to be over 5 ½ years old, is the latest confirmed case of BSE in Japan, the 18th case so far. The cow was found in the Hokkaido prefecture.

The only hitch in this chain of seeming positive developments is the Japanese government refuses to set a date for resumption of trade. The government wants the Commission to deem U.S. beef as safe as Japanese beef and to take public comment. The public comment period began May 13 and continues until May 20.

Return to top

Biotech Cow to be Used in BSE Immunity Testing in Japan

A genetically modified cow developed by a South Korean team of researchers will be used in Japan to see if the animal is immune to BSE. The animal is being used in testing at the University of Tsukuba Laboratory Animal Resource Center. In December 2003, Dr. Hwang Woo-seok, a professor at Seoul National University, announced he and his team had produced four genetically modified calves they claim are BSE resistant.

 

Return to top

Oman Opens Market to U.S. Beef

The government of Oman lifted its ban on U.S. beef and beef products this week. This adds $61,000 to the U.S. beef trade plus column.

 

Return to top

USDA BSE Cattle Testing Nears 350,000

By the time you read this, USDA will have tested over 350,000 beef animals for BSE. As of May 12, 347,491 animals had tested negative for BSE, with testing averaging over 8,000 animals a week.

 

Return to top

USDA Unveils Multi-Year Animal ID Plan

USDA is seeking comment on its intention to issue a multi-year animal identification plan. Secretary of Agriculture Mike Johanns this week released a “thinking paper” and a timeline on animal ID, and asked industry leaders to provide feedback. The paper says USDA wishes to have in place stakeholder premises and animal ID procedures by January 2008, and defined animal-movement recording is to be in place by January 2009. The full documents can be found at www.usda.gov/nais.

Return to top


New Bills

A number of new bills have been introduced. Click here to send a request for a copy of the text or more information about the bill.

H.R.2234
Rep. Tim Murphy (R-PA) introduced a bill to authorize HHS to make health information technology grants.

H.R.2299
Legislation offered by Rep. Frank Pallone (D-NJ) would require FDA to establish therapeutic equivalence requirements for generic drugs.

H.R.2308
A bill introduced by Rep. Dave Weldon (R-DE) would provide for clinical research support grants, clinical research infrastructure grants and a demonstration program on partnerships in clinical research.

H.R.2345
Rep. Steve Israel (D-NY) introduced a bill to increase criminal penalties for the sale or trade of prescription drugs knowingly caused to be adulterated or misbranded, to modify requirements for maintaining records of the chain-of-custody of prescription drugs and to establish recall authority

H.R.2352
Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) offered legislation that would require health claims for foods and dietary supplements include accurate statements of the curative, mitigation, treatment and prevention effects of nutrients on disease or health-related conditions.

 

Return to top


 

 

Inside Track is produced as a service to clients of Policy Directions, Inc., a Washington, DC-based government relations/strategic government communications firm founded in 1995, specializing in customized advocacy on health care; food; biomedical research; biotechnology, human drug, and medical device regulation; federal nutrition policy and programs; and environmental policies and programs. For more information about PDI, please e-mail info@poldir.com.

All material © 2005 Policy Directions.

Policy Directions Inc | 818 Connecticut Ave NW Suite 950 | Washington, DC 20006 | (202) 776-0071 | info@poldir.com