HomeAbout UsServicesClient AchievementsNewsStaffContact Us

June 24, 2005

Back to News

In this Issue


House Judiciary Subcommittee Considers Controlled Substances Amendments


E&C Looks at Medicaid Drug Payment


Energy & Commerce Subcommittee Reports Rx Drug Abuse Control Bill


PETA Alleged to Kill Animals


Mistrial Declared in Animal Terrorism Prosecution


CAFTA Vote Possible Next Week; White House Trying to Appease Sugar


EPA Agrees to Delay Deadline for Signing Air Quality Agreements


Johanns Announces $141 Million for Ag Product Export Promotion


Voluntary COOL Language Included in Senate Food Promotion Bill


Senate Committee Approves $17.35-Billion FY2006 Ag Spending Bill


Highway Conferees Might Have Conference Deal on Cost


BSE UPDATE:

 

 

House Judiciary Subcommittee Considers Controlled Substances Amendments

At a mark-up session June 23, the House Judiciary subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, & Homeland Security reported two bills to full committee that amend the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), H.R.184 and 869.

H.R.869 amends provisions of CSA allowing health care practitioners, in the context of their own practices, to prescribe opiates to treat opiate addiction. Current law limits such prescribing to 30 patients per practitioner or per group practice. Thus, regardless of how many physicians are in a group practice, or how many patients may need treatment, only 30 patients may be treated. This limitation has proven unworkable for group practices and, according to practitioners and drug addiction experts, has resulted in thousands of patients not receiving treatment. H.R.869 removes the 30-patient limit for group practices, while retaining it for individual practitioners.

Companion Senate legislation (S.45) is pending Senate Judiciary Committee action.

H.R.184 modifies exportation of controlled substances requirements which currently allow exportation only to the single country that will use the product. The bill would allow a controlled substance be further exported to another country, so long as certain reporting and record-keeping requirements are met and the importing countries are signatories to U.S. drug control treaties.

Both bills are expected to be considered by the full Judiciary Committee shortly. They already have been reported by the Energy & Commerce Committee.

Return to top

E&C Looks at Medicaid Drug Payment

On June 22, the House Energy & Commerce subcommittee on Health held a hearing on “Medicaid Prescription Drugs: Examining Options for Payment Reform.” Testifying before the subcommittee were representatives from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the Government Accountability Office (GAO), the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System, the National Association of Chain Drug Stores, Health Management Associates of Indianapolis and the American Enterprise Institute.

In his testimony, Dr. Douglas Holtz-Eakins of CBO presented CBO’s findings from the December 2004 report, “Medicaid’s Reimbursements to Pharmacies for Prescription Drugs.” The report found Medicaid prescription drug spending has increased substantially and the amount paid for distributing and dispensing drugs to Medicaid beneficiaries is a significant component of the programs drug spending. The report also concludes much of the increase in mark up, from what pharmacies or wholesalers pay for prescriptions to what Medicaid pays, is accounted for by newer generic drugs. CBO attributes the size of the mark ups – and thus a substantial cost to Medicaid – to the use of Average Wholesale Price (AWP) as the basis for determining reimbursements. While CBO does not make recommendations to Congress, it was clear from Holtz-Eakins’ responses and the report that a recommendation would be to change from an AWP-based system.

Testifying for GAO, Kathy King reported on the GAO analysis of the Medicaid rebate program, “Inadequate Oversight Raises Concerns About Rebates Paid to States.” The report, first issued in February, notes GAO’s determination more oversight is needed to ensure best price and rebates are calculated based on reporting and that CMS needs to issue clearer guidance on how prices should be calculated. It is particularly important, GAO said, for CMS to be clear on how manufacturers calculate what prices are included in the best price, and which discounted prices are not included. Rep. Mike Bilirakis (R-FL) asked whether Medicaid pays far more than anyone else for drugs; King responded she was not able to answer based on the report.

Speaking on behalf of the chain drug stores, Craig Fuller said if the AWP-based system is changed, an alternative payment basis be chosen that does not exacerbate existing problems. In particular, this system should not achieve Medicaid savings principally through costs to pharmacists. He recommended use of Wholesale Acquisition Cost (WAC) rather than other methods such as Average Sales Price (ASP) or Average Manufacturers Price (AMP). He also strongly recommended policies that encourage and increase generic drug dispensing and utilization.

Members on both sides of the aisle agreed Medicaid’s drug payment system is fundamentally flawed and needs changing. Among specific elements of change highlighted by subcommittee Chair Rep. Nathan Deal (R-GA) were price transparency, an accurate accounting of pharmacists’ actual costs for prescriptions, and equitable payment to pharmacists for the services they provide. Acknowledging the importance of generic drugs, Deal also said generics are keeping Medicaid drug costs artificially high because the mark-ups between what the pharmacy and Medicaid pays are greater for newer generics than for branded drugs or older products.

The subcommittee is planning to hold additional hearings on Medicaid reform, including discussions on drug payment changes.

Return to top

Energy & Commerce Subcommittee Reports Rx Drug Abuse Control Bill

On June 22, the House Energy & Commerce subcommittee on Health reported to the full Committee H.R.1132, the “National All Schedules Prescription Electronic Reporting Act of 2005.” The bill, sponsored by Rep. Ed Whitfield (R-KY) and 32 others, authorizes funding for states to establish or improve systems to monitor the prescribing of controlled substances, provide for information sharing among health care practitioners, share information across state lines, and facilitate actions to prevent inappropriate prescribing and ”doctor shopping.”

Specifically the bill would require HHS to award grants to states, develop standards for information collection and sharing to ensure privacy is protected, recommend enforcement actions and penalties for violating privacy, study state programs and report to Congress. State systems would include an electronic database and requirements for those who dispense controlled substances to report the dispensing to the state within a week. The information in the database could be provided to practitioners, law enforcement and drug control authorities, and specified state and federal health agencies.

In speaking about the importance of the bill, Whitfield noted the growing problem of prescription drug abuse. He said control efforts are hampered since some states have monitoring systems in place, but others do not, allowing offenders to simply cross state lines. In opposing the legislation, Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) raised concerns the bill does not go far enough to ensure privacy protections. He acknowledged the bill includes some protections and was assured the bill’s sponsors will continue to work with him to address his concerns.

Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) introduced a similar, S.518, which has been reported by the Senate Health, Education, Labor, & Pensions Committee.

Return to top

PETA Alleged to Kill Animals

Last Wednesday, two employees of the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) were charged with 31 felony counts each of animal cruelty and eight misdemeanor counts each of illegal disposal of dead animals. Adria Hinkle and Andrew Cook were arrested for allegedly euthanizing dogs and cats taken from a North Carolina animal shelter and tossing their bodies in a shopping center dumpster.

They made their first appearance June 17 in Hertford County District Court, Virginia; the next court date has been set for July 19. The maximum sentence for each of the 31 felony counts of animal cruelty is 15 months in jail while the eight cases of misdemeanor counts of illegal dumping of animal carries a maximum sentence of 60 days in jail.

 

Return to top

Mistrial Declared in Animal Terrorism Prosecution

A mistrial was declared this week in the criminal prosecution of animal extremists, known as the "SHAC 6," on charges they violated the Animal Enterprise Protection Act (AEPA). The prosecution against defendants Kevin Kjonaas, Lauren Gazzola, Jacob Conroy, Joshua Harper, Darius Fullmer, Andrew Stepanian, and Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (SHAC), was the first of its kind, since the AEPA was amended in 2002 to include the crime of "animal enterprise terrorism."

U.S. District Judge Mary L. Cooper declared the mistrial following a week-long delay that was granted after Kjonaas' attorney Isabel McGinty became ill. McGinty fell faint during her opening argument and was hospitalized for several days. Her doctor advised her she needed two more weeks to recover.

Associated Press reports the six activists will be retried some time in the future, "not likely before September," according to a spokesman in the U.S. Attorney's office. Animal enterprise terrorism carries a maximum penalty of three years in prison and $250,000 fine. The activists also face charges of conspiracy and interstate stalking, which are also punishable with a $250,000 fine.


Return to top

CAFTA Vote Possible Next Week; White House Trying to Appease Sugar

The deal-makers are in overdrive trying to come up with a package of concessions to the sugar industry that will “hold the industry harmless” when CAFTA hits the floor, as early as next week. President Bush sent the enabling legislation to the Hill late in the evening June 23.

CAFTA proponents do not want the trade pact vote to linger until after the July 4 congressional recess, giving opponents more time to line up negative votes.

So far the deal to the sugar interests centers on enforcing the 1.5-million-ton annual ceiling on sugar imports through the life of the Farm Bill, which technically expires at the end of 2007. In addition, Secretary of Agriculture Mike Johanns told members of the Senate this week that he may use his Commodity Credit Corp. (CCC) authority to buy U.S. commodities to donate to CAFTA countries in lieu of accepting increased sugar imports under the trade pact. The move is part of efforts to assuage fears that sugar imports would be high enough to collapse the federal sugar program.

However, most sugar interests were saying they had not seen any offers from the Administration and wouldn’t publicly comment. However, the American Sugar Alliance called the Johanns offer “woefully short and inadequate.” Members of the Senate were all over the board, some saying the offers were “intriguing,” and others saying they didn’t go far enough because the “relief” only extends through 2007.

The Administration was not thrilled with a separate proposal that would give sugar interests a $1.50 tax credit for ethanol production. That offer also met with opposition from farm groups, particularly the corn growers. Since a 51-cent per gallon ethanol subsidy for any commodity from with ethanol can be made already exists, providing a new and different tax incentive “would be divisive.”

Return to top

EPA Agrees to Delay Deadline for Signing Air Quality Agreements

EPA extended until July 29, 2005, the deadline for farmers to decide whether to sign the agency’s air quality consent agreements, providing additional time for producers to consider the ramifications of signing on to the program.

The extension, in response to a request by the National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF), also clarifies that farmers who do sign on to the consent agreements and pay a penalty to gain “a safe harbor” from past and current air quality violations, admit no legal liability or any wrongdoing. Previously the agency had said a farmer’s signing “is not an admission that any of his/her agricultural operations has been operated negligently or improperly or that any such operation is or was in violation of any federal, state or local law or regulation.”

EPA clarification is found at www.epa.gov/compliance/resources/agreements/caa/cafo-agr-response-com.html.

Return to top

Johanns Announces $141 Million for Ag Product Export Promotion

Agriculture Secretary Mike Johanns this week announced the department will fund $141 million worth of promotion efforts by 70 trade organizations for U.S. agriculture exports overseas. USDA said exports account for about 25% of farm cash receipts. The programs funded include the Market Access Program and the Quality Samples Program. Groups receiving the cost-share funding and the amounts received are found at www.fas.usda.gov/mos/default.htm.

Return to top

Voluntary COOL Language Included in Senate Food Promotion Bill

Language to establish a voluntary country-of-origin labeling (COOL) program for agriculture commodities, including meat, is included in new legislation designed to help food producers promote their efforts and the quality of their products

The key to the language introduced by Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA), said the National Cattlemen’s Beef Assn. (NCBA), is it returns control of the program to the marketplace. Therefore, where demand is demonstrated, COOL is available. Also, the program allows any group in food production, retailing or food service to participate, meaning more products will be promoted based on the success of existing regional, state and brand name labeling programs.

Santorum said USDA can use existing labeling programs to serve the same purpose of a national label, and consumers will receive the same information regarding where their food comes from, but in a more cost-efficient way.

Return to top

Senate Committee Approves $17.35-Billion FY2006 Ag Spending Bill

Maintaining the fast-track approach on appropriations, the Senate subcommittee and full committee on FY2006 agricultural appropriations completed action this week and approved a nearly $17.5-billion spending package for the coming fiscal year.

Senate floor action is expected to occur after the Senate returns from its July 4 recess. At that time several amendments, which full committee chairman Sen. Thad Cochran (R-MS) asked not be brought to the full committee, will be debated.

Overall spending for agriculture and FDA approved by the full Senate committee totals $100.15 billion, slightly above the President’s request of $99.561 billion, and about $15 billion more than spent in FY2005.

Return to top

Highway Conferees Might Have Conference Deal on Cost

It appears key House and Senate highway reauthorization bill conferees cut a deal this week to approve $286.5 billion in federal highway spending over six years. The price tag reportedly agreed to means the Senate has given up nearly $30 billion, but the cost still exceeds the White House limit of $283.9 billion, above which a veto is threatened.

Optimists say the cost agreement sets the stage for completing work on the highway bill early next week. However as of June 24, leadership for the respective chambers said they had not signed off on an agreement and that any such deal would need full conference approval. If the deal holds, it will be a least Tuesday before a conference framework is agreed to, meaning an eighth extension of existing highway programs needs to be approved.

Return to top

BSE UPDATE

Second U.S. BSE Case Confirmed

Agriculture Secretary Mike Johanns today confirmed the second U.S. case of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE). Johanns announced USDA received positive final test results from the Weybridge, England testing facility on an animal that was blocked from the food/feed supply in November 2004.

“We are currently testing nearly 1,000 animals per day as part of our BSE enhanced surveillance program, more than 388,000 total tests, and this is the first confirmed case resulting from our surveillance,” Johanns said in a statement. Johanns directed USDA scientists to work with international experts to develop a new protocol that includes performing dual confirmatory tests in the event of another "inconclusive" BSE screening test.

USDA has not yet completed an epidemiological investigation to determine the animal's herd of origin. However, it is known that the animal was born before the U.S. instituted a ruminant-to-ruminant feed ban in August 1997. The “downer” animal was selected for testing because it was considered to be at higher risk for BSE.

Return to top

 

USDA’s Penn Says Japan Beef Talks Moving Slowly

USDA this week said it has warned the Japanese government again that if the pace of negotiations to reopen beef trade doesn’t speed up, Congress may intervene in the process. Undersecretary J.B. Penn met with Japanese officials June 21, part of a team in the U.S. to review feeding, processing and testing systems in this country. Penn said conversations were “frank”, but the process is moving “terribly, terribly slow.” Several members of Congress have introduced resolutions calling for sanctions on Japanese trade if beef exports don’t resume soon.

Return to top

 

Austria Reports Second Case of Mad Cow

The second case of BSE has been confirmed in Austria, the government reported this week. The cow died unexpectedly in May after showing possible neurological symptoms, officials said, adding their looking at what the animal was fed as well as “spontaneous mutation in the prions.” Feeding animal byproducts to cattle has been banned in Austria since 1991.

Return to top

 

Consumers Union Calls on Johanns to Test All Cattle Over 20 Months Old at Slaughter Using Western Blot

Consumers Union (CU) this week sent a formal request to Agriculture Secretary Mike Johanns to immediately begin testing all beef animals over 20 months of age at slaughter and to adopt the Western Blot test as part of USDA’s testing protocol.

CU said it wants to see the supersensitive Western Blot test used along with the IHC testing when confirming suspect cases, and to “make clear to the public that a positive result on either test indicates that the suspect cow is positive for BSE.”

Return to top

New Bills

A number of new bills have been introduced. Click here to send a request for a copy of the text or more information about the bill.

S.1281
Sens. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX) and Bill Nelson (D-FL) introduced the “NASA Authorization Act of 2005.”

S.1300
A bill offered by Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA) would establish a voluntary program for country of origin labeling of agricultural products.

 

Return to top


Inside Track is produced as a service to clients of Policy Directions, Inc., a Washington, DC-based government relations/strategic government communications firm founded in 1995, specializing in customized advocacy on health care; food; biomedical research; biotechnology, human drug, and medical device regulation; federal nutrition policy and programs; and environmental policies and programs. For more information about PDI, please e-mail info@poldir.com.

All material © 2005 Policy Directions.

Policy Directions Inc | 818 Connecticut Ave NW Suite 950 | Washington, DC 20006 | (202) 776-0071 | info@poldir.com